First, we looked at the terms listed against each topic, then we read the most representative articles for each group identified by the model. One author then developed a descriptive title, which was reviewed and https://intuit-payroll.org/ perhaps modified before being approved by the remaining authors. The final topic names are listed in Table 2, along with the 20 most important words for each topic and the marginal distribution of each topic.
- When conducting an SLR, it is important to assemble a proper body of literature so as not to bias the results (Massaro et al., 2016).
- It promises to provide better data quality, increase financial reporting transparency, and provide real-time reporting in an environment that increases trust and lessens the opportunity for fraud.
- Digital technology has played a vital role in helping the field progress even further.
- The public blockchain revolutionises accounting by introducing a single shared base layer of bookkeeping.
Figure 6 shows a cooccurrence heatmap of the main authors’ keywords (more than five occurrences) in this cluster. Table 3 provides some quantitative data (total citation and CPY) regarding the studies with the highest impact on this topic. Researchers have worked to build a theory to explain how blockchain will change accounting. Some research products have used general frameworks such as the technology–organization–environment framework (Dai and Vasarhelyi, 2017) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (Ferri et al., 2020). Many others do not refer to a theoretical framework in their analysis of this phenomenon because they provide general overviews of the possible uses, benefits and limitations of blockchain in the context of accounting (Pimentel and Boulianne, 2020). This topic includes 64 research products published between 1980 and 2021.
(2019), “Implementation of blockchain technology in accounting sphere”, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Vol. Academics, together with practitioners, should work on specifying how these regulatory dimensions need to be developed, what type of disclosures are relevant to cryptocurrencies and how disclosure costs may further impact market uncertainty (Cao et al., 2018). Clarifying the regulatory framework will probably also lead to more ICOs, as initiators will be better prepared and be able to respond to uncertainty in blockchain policy by increasing their voluntary disclosures (Zhang et al., 2021; Gurrea-Martínez and Remolina, 2018). Research on the efficiency and effectiveness of ICOs will be of high interest in the future.
Volunteering roles
To determine which articles should be excluded because of irrelevance, we manually analyzed the titles; abstracts; keywords; and, if necessary, the full text of the articles (Booth et al., 2012, p. 99). To do so, we clustered the articles into the categories shown in Table 1, and we excluded those not pertinent to our research questions that had been erroneously captured by our research string. Using a personal home computer in 2015, it would take about 98 years to mine just one Bitcoin. In 2018, the amount of electricity used to mine cryptocurrency can heat a home. On an aggregate basis, mining would represent the seventh largest country by electricity consumption. If the result is greater or equal to the target value (pattern), the nonce is incremented and the hash is recalculated.
With this approach, a new key is generated for every new piece of information you publish on the blockchain. However, through a cryptographic derivation function, it is still possible to prove the identity behind a party, making them legally accountable for the data they upload. Financial systems integrated with the blockchain have an immutable backup of the state of things that systems can resync from the blockchain.
Related articles
Although the technology is rapidly evolving and will likely have an impact on accounting and auditing, some skepticism is warranted regarding potential benefits and ease of implementation. For now, the benefits are likely being oversold, while the costs and difficulty of implementation are likely being undersold. Importantly, while technologies provide unparalleled benefits in the audit process, they do not stand alone in the transformation of the audit. The promise of this powerful combination is not just a game changer for the audit world, but also a benefit for organizations and a boost to investor confidence overall. Performing confirmations of a company’s financial status would be less necessary if some or all of the transactions that underlie that status are visible on blockchains. And going back to blockchain, things like smart contracts, that’s absolutely something where the profession needs to play a role with the SOC standard and give some level of trust that people’s smart contracts are written properly.
Blockchain could have use cases and drive innovation in many sectors, such as those of banking, financial markets, retail, supply chains, healthcare, manufacturing, governance and insurance (Gaur, 2020). In financial sectors, in addition to supporting cryptocurrencies, it offers an opportunity for entrepreneurs who want to create value-reducing financial exclusion (Larios-Hernández, 2017). Figure 7 shows a cooccurrence heatmap of the main authors’ keywords (more than five occurrences) in this cluster. Table 4 provides some quantitative data (total citation and CPY) regarding the studies with the highest impact on this topic.
Blockchain uses this system to store data about the previous block, the transaction and a timestamp. Since each block includes information about its preceding block, it forms a chain that connects them. On top of that, the transaction date serves to prove the existence of the transaction. The introduction of standardized bodies and procedures has helped this field go global. On top of that, using technology in this area has also enhanced its reach greatly.
Massaro et al. (2016, p. 2) characterise an SLR as “a method for studying a corpus of scholarly literature, to develop insights, critical reflections, future research paths and research questions”. The possibilities that blockchain brings to information disclosure, fraud detection and overcoming the threat of shadow dealings in developing countries all contribute to the importance of further investigation into blockchain in accounting. A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of sustainable development goals (SDGs)”, Business Strategy and the Environment, (August), Vol. (2017), “Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. From an accounting perspective, cryptocurrencies fulfill the asset definition given by the conceptual framework of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) (Morozova et al., 2020; Ram et al., 2016).
Many companies are also welcoming this technology into their finance departments. Before discussing those uses, it is crucial to understand what blockchain is. accounting cycle guide Through many iterations and collaborative design thinking, we have developed a way to exchange complete invoice data in a peer-to-peer and trusted manner.
1 The changing role of accountants
Fang and Hope (2021) indicate that blockchain is more effectively implemented in teams comprising accountants, managers and experienced analysts as opposed to teams consisting only of highly experienced analysts. We expect that blockchain will involve more multi-tasked teams with diverse knowledge and skills to generate additional synergies. Therefore, future research may analyse the characteristics of teams and government bodies that work better together for the most efficient implementation and decision-making using blockchain. Currently, regulators monitor the field of cryptoassets on a case-by-case basis, but not to the extent that investors, or would-be-investors, could determine with certainty how cryptoassets may be treated (Smith et al., 2019). Nor are all market participants eager to treat cryptoassets as a security due to their volatility, making it difficult to ascertain an appropriate value to record for income statement and balance sheet purposes (Smith et al., 2019; Tan and Low, 2019).
As blockchain technology continues to advance and new and different uses are found, it will be up to the accountancy profession to ensure that its promises of transparency and accountability are fulfilled. Auditing requires the confirmation of transactions and balances on firms’ accounting ledgers at the end of the reporting period due to time-lags, reconciliations, and accounting entries. Prior research points to a growing trend in the topic of new skills for teams when implementing blockchain and using this technology in day-to-day work (Changati and Kansal, 2019).
In addition, unforeseen add-on tech and services will be needed and created. Historically, the accounting field has used a double-entry system for bookkeeping. Nonetheless, it offers a highly stable method to record and account for transactions.
(2018), “Auditing with smart contracts”, The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, Vol. (2019), “NFTs in practice – non-fungible tokens as core component of a blockchain-based event ticketing application”, Paper presented at the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2019. Van Hoek (2019) notes that a need for transparency and visibility motivates blockchain implementation and that the main barrier facing such an implementation is a lack of understanding of how to integrate and leverage blockchain investments.
Systems can crash or lose an internet connection, get hacked or be taken hostage in a ransomware attack. The blockchain acts as a backup network that can be resynced into your private systems. The append-only nature of the blockchain ensures actors are held accountable for their actions. When an error is made, an actor can only write a new entry to straighten the record. Interpretation of the data is subjective and, upon a dispute, requires mediators and traditional laws and courts to interpret. Centralising data in a distributed ledger also streamlines data exchange securely and competently.
DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the “Deloitte” name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Please see /about to learn more about our global network of member firms.
Add Comment